Shop More Submit  Join Login
About Literature / Hobbyist Premium Member Work in ProgressCanada Groups :iconanthro-lit: Anthro-Lit
Recent Activity
Deviant for 10 Years
12 Month Premium Membership
Statistics 1,556 Deviations 31,213 Comments 93,854 Pageviews

Newest Deviations

Interested in climate change? I've got a Stack of articles, right here!…

If you disagree with something that I or anyone has said, please QUOTE THE EXACT WORDS YOU DISAGREE WITH. This avoids many misunderstandings.

If you cannot do that, then don't be surprised if I don't want to be bothered with you.

To all the rest, Come on in, Read and Learn! That is all I ask. I do not claim special knowledge; in fact, I freely admit that I have a long way to go.
But with a degree in geology and 30 years of following this, I think I have a pretty good idea of which way to go.
In the end, which way you choose to believe, is up to you. But you should base your decision upon the facts, not upon hype.




NOTE: some of the material I will present over the next few days, is very graphic. At least one person has told me they never want to see it Again. I am putting this warning up for their benefit as well as yours.

Things are not going well for those who have faith in the UNproven theory of 'man-made' global warming.

The Tropical Hot Spot never materialized.

The Antarctic, which has supposedly been melting down and will eventually swamp us all, has actually been cooling. Antarctic sea ice has hit an all-time record. Meanwhile IPCC climate models say that Antarctic ice has been in decline the past 30 years.

Polar bear numbers are actually (if slowly) Increasing- and those regions where they say polar bears are on the decline? There is little to NO research going on in those areas, so they have NO numbers to begin with!

Winters were supposed to get warmer, wetter, shorter. Instead, snow extent has increased, some of the coldest winters in well over a century have occurred in the past 8 years, and growing seasons are being truncated at both ends.

Despite that last, we continue to see record food crops world-wide- something they said would fall with continued warming.

Research papers on climate sensitivity continue to point to numbers well below those used in IPCC climate models, thereby negating the vast majority of 'catastrophic' claims.

And the Earth's average temperature has all but Flat-lined over the past 18 years. A closer look indicates that a very slight (.01) cooling trend has materialized over the past 13 years.

All of this tends to piss off True Believers. This Can't be happening! Their climate gods said it wouldn't happen! There MUST be a scapegoat!

Having tried their best to demean, denigrate and demonize skeptics of the UNproven theory of 'man-made' global warming, the most vocal Believers have long since begun suggesting that much more stringent efforts need to be made, against those of us who choose to point to Reality, instead of climate models and heavily politicized, corrupted-by-ideology climate science.

What follows is PART I of as many parts as it takes, to get the message across:

 Eco-jihad - the movie

Otherwise known as the 10:10 video.

This cinema advertisement is being portrayed as a humorous "attention-grabber", the warmists' idea of gentle fun to promote the idea of individuals cutting down their "carbon" (meaning carbon dioxide) footprint.

The central idea is that disparate groups (and individuals) are invited to join a "groupthink" campaign. The "refuseniks" are then asked to identify themselves, all under the catch-phrase "no pressure".

Invariably portrayed as sullen and humourless, the "unbelievers" - having been "outed" - are publicly executed in a manner that leaves little to the imagination. The effects are not dissimilar to that of a terrorist bomb, their deaths "activated" by a little grey box with a red button, very much in the manner of triggering a bomb. The whole thing is lovingly documented in this post (now marked "access denied") and this photo sequence (now removed - they have been busy!).  (Thanks to :iconstephdumas: that post can be found here… )

There is a very obvious message to the faithful. The unbelievers must die.

The parallel with Jihadi videos is unmissable the authors display the same fundamentalist mindset which no pretence at humour can disguise.

Most chilling of all is the casual attitudes and lack of emotion of the cold-blooded killers, the blood-splattered "teacher" happily smiling while giving homework instructions to her shocked class, after having murdered two of her charges. The SS would have been so proud of her.

This is not the first time we have got a glimpse into the foetid minds of the warmists – one example Caroline Lucas last year, who famously announced that air travel was worse than stabbing someone in the street – despite her own addiction to this form of travel.

Dellers has a go and as he earlier points out, the eco-fascists are fond of their violent parallels and barely concealed references to 9/11 and concentration camps. But this is the first time they have portrayed (and thereby tacitly advocated) the public execution of unbelievers, in a film that elevates adherence to a belief system above the value of human life.

Had any other religious group done similar, in such a graphic form – Hamas, for instance, suggesting that Jews should be blown apart (as they often do) – even under the guise of humour, then, rightly, there would be outcry.

It appears, though, that for the warmists to promote violent, public murder is acceptable - at least, according to The Guardian. But, if Leni Riefenstahl had made this film about the Jews, would The Guardian have found that funny as well?

The enemy, in this Eco-jihad video, is revealing its true face. And above is that face - Richard Curtis producer of the film and director Dougal Wilson, with the 10:10 gang. The scene looks normal and the Greenshirts look human, but they are not. This is the face of evil. When do we see the yellow armbands and the gas chambers?

And DEFEAT. The 10:10 organisation has now issued an apology, text reproduced above.  "We're all about trying new and creative ways of getting people to take action on climate change. Unfortunately, in this instance, we missed the mark. Oh well, we live and learn ... Onwards and upwards," they write. Do they think that is enough?

Yet, clearly, the warmists are incredibly sensitive. The Guardian website did not like me posing the question: "if Leni Riefenstahl had made this film about the Jews, would The Guardian have found that funny as well?" The result is pasted above.

Whatever this paper might like to say about its moderation policy, this is evidence of censorship. That is what we have come to, a newspaper which endorses murder - as long as it is presented as "tongue in cheek" - and which actively practices censorship when it is criticised.

To prove the point, a post asking for an explanation of why the earlier comment has been removed disappears completely - there is no trace of a question ever having been asked. And a slight change is made to posting arrangements, as can be seen from the above notification. One is not only censored, but punished for complaining about it. The Nazis and The Guardian now have a great deal in common. On this paper at least, the eco-fascists rule.


Here is the 10:10 video (NOTE! WATCH AT YOUR OWN RISK!):…


They are losing the argument- and Planet Earth is leading the way. We skeptics are merely pointing to the information which media, politicians and radical activists / scientists, wish you would never find out about. And they very Badly want us Silenced.

This one's for You, :iconscythemantis:
I'm tired of both your willful ignorance and that of many who come my way, not to reason with me, not to think about the information presented, but to scream and Bitch about things they don't even make the effort to learn about. Not to mention the lies and smears you fling my way.

  • Mood: Contempt
  • Reading: Disc World books by Terry Pratchet

Obama was given 6 months to do something about climate change What do you believe his action will be? 

5 deviants said He will shut down major portions of the economy, to reduce CO2 emissions.
3 deviants said He will price energy out of site, and the Middle Class into extinction, or at least, Serfdom.
3 deviants said He will give 100,000,000,000 dollars to 'climate affected' nations- ie, to war lords, thugocrats and weapons merchants, world-wide
3 deviants said Some level of each of any or all of the above.
2 deviants said What else? Please comment.
2 deviants said Comment either way!
1 deviant said He will push ahead on efforts to geo-engineer the climate, regardless of science which demonstrates low climate sensitivity and therefore much lower 'bad' effects of climate.


Add a Comment:
Akiles09 Featured By Owner 3 days ago
Thank you for the llama!
HimitsuUK Featured By Owner 5 days ago   Photographer
Thank you for the poll feedback :) Interesting page, I'm watching :D
uki--uki Featured By Owner 6 days ago
You gonna love this one,…

Dignity laugh 
Crazy-Eel Featured By Owner 3 days ago  Hobbyist Writer
Where the heck do those conclusions come from? Climate change = crime rate change? That doesn't make any sense!
Kajm Featured By Owner 6 days ago  Hobbyist Writer
*sighs* Unbelievable. Literally :P
ScarabsCorner Featured By Owner Oct 14, 2014  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
thanks for the fave
Spazkid1997 Featured By Owner Oct 13, 2014
Global Warming my ass. Last year, the north may have felt it, but in Winter 2011, when I was in 9th Grade, the fountain at my school iced over.

Kajm Featured By Owner Oct 13, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
That's the thing about when they claim that winters have only gotten colder in some places, and try to blame it on warming: Outside of prevailing winds for any particular region, the Jet Stream and other major circulation patterns, are always shifting the boundaries of large weather patterns, back and forth. So from time to time a region that might normally see cold winters and lots of snow, Won't (and vice-versa). And that's when they swoop in and say 'See? We told you so!' Completely misrepresenting what is actually going on.
Spazkid1997 Featured By Owner Oct 13, 2014
Hm. I would guess that it has something to do with aerosols. For me, the whole argument on Global Warming is a joke; the only reason this issue exists as actively as it does today is because Al Gore brought it up as a cheap cash-in designed for schmucks, and when Climategate happened, he pulled back; he had already made his fortune. There's more controversy over this subject than there is over JFK's assassination. For me, the main issue we should be focusing on is that we're eventually gonna run out of resources, and when we do, we'd better be able to be ready to travel to other planets when that happens.
Kajm Featured By Owner Oct 13, 2014  Hobbyist Writer
*nods* I am mostly in agreement with you. I think we should be out prepping to explore other worlds already. Unfortunately Oh!bummer! chopped a big hole in space exploration :(
(1 Reply)
Add a Comment: