Kajm on DeviantArthttps://www.deviantart.com/kajm/art/Actual-Studies-Continue-to-Fall-Below-IPCC-numbers-521342947Kajm

Deviation Actions

Kajm's avatar

Actual Studies Continue to Fall Below IPCC numbers

By
Published:
1.1K Views

Description

Yet another study has come out demonstrating that climate sensitivity is at or Below the Lowest numbers climate alarmists love to scare you with. A very good (and somewhat technical) breakdown can be found here climateaudit.org/2015/03/19/th…

Climate sensitivity is the equilibrium temperature change in response to changes of the radiative forcing. In this case, CO2. The numbers being projected (in degrees C) are for a doubling of CO2, to 560 PPM (we are currently right around 400PPM). It will take about another 50-70 years to reach 560PPM.

Those who want you to believe current climate change is YOUR fault, would like you to believe that climate sensitivity numbers are far higher than 30 years' worth of studies have so far shown.

What follows is a list of other peer-reviewed research papers and studies (List is incomplete, I shall have to find the others), which all fall roughly into the same range:


Climate Sensitivity:
The short-term influence of various concentrations of atmospheric carbon dioxide on the temperature profile in the boundary layer
(Pure and Applied Geophysics, Volume 113, Issue 1, pp. 331-353, 1975)
- Wilford G. Zdunkowski, Jan Paegle, Falko K. Fye


+0.5 °C

Questions Concerning the Possible Influence of Anthropogenic CO2 on Atmospheric Temperature
(Journal of Applied Meteorology, Volume 18, Issue 6, pp. 822-825, June 1979)
- Reginald E. Newell, Thomas G. Dopplick


* Reply to Robert G. Watts' "Discussion of 'Questions Concerning the Possible Influence of Anthropogenic CO2 on Atmospheric Temperature'"
(Journal of Applied Meteorology, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp. 114–117, January 1981)
- Reginald E. Newell, Thomas G. Dopplick


+0.3 °C

CO2-induced global warming: a skeptic's view of potential climate change (PDF)
(Climate Research, Volume 10, Number 1, pp. 69–82, April 1998)
- Sherwood B. Idso


+0.4 °C

Revised 21st century temperature projections (PDF)
(Climate Research, Volume 23, Number 1, pp. 1–9, December 2002)
- Patrick J. Michaels, Paul C. Knappenberger, Oliver W. Frauenfeld, Robert E. Davis


+1.9 °C

Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth's climate system (PDF)
(Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 112, Issue D24, November 2007)
- Stephen E. Schwartz


* Reply to comments by G. Foster et al., R. Knutti et al., and N. Scafetta on "Heat capacity, time constant, and sensitivity of Earth's climate system" (PDF)
(Journal of Geophysical Research, Volume 113, Issue D15, August 2008)
- Stephen E. Schwartz


+1.9 °C

Aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity deduced from the Last Glacial Maximum to Holocene transition (PDF)
(Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 35, Issue 4, February 2008)
- Petr Chylek, Ulrike Lohmann


* Reply to comment by Andrey Ganopolski and Thomas Schneider von Deimling on “Aerosol radiative forcing and climate sensitivity deduced from the Last Glacial Maximum to Holocene transition” (PDF)
(Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 35, Issue 23, December 2008)
- Petr Chylek, Ulrike Lohmann


+1.3-2.3 °C

Limits on CO2 Climate Forcing from Recent Temperature Data of Earth (PDF)
(Energy & Environment, Volume 20, Number 1-2, pp. 177-189, January 2009)
- David H. Douglass, John R. Christy


+1.1 °C

On the Observational Determination of Climate Sensitivity and Its Implications (PDF)
(Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, Volume 47, Number 4, pp. 377-390, August 2011)
- Richard S. Lindzen, Yong-Sang Choi


+0.7 °C

Climate Sensitivity Estimated from Temperature Reconstructions of the Last Glacial Maximum (PDF)
(Science, Volume 334, Number 6061, pp. 1385-1388, November 2011)
- Andreas Schmittner et al.


+1.7-2.6 °C

Probabilistic Estimates of Transient Climate Sensitivity Subject to Uncertainty in Forcing and Natural Variability (PDF)
(Journal of Climate, Volume 24, Issue 21, pp. 5521-5537, Novmeber 2011)
- Lauren E. Padilla, Geoffrey K. Vallis, Clarence W. Rowley


+1.6 °C

Improved constraints on 21st-century warming derived using 160 years of temperature observations
(Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 39, Number 1, January 2012)
- N. P. Gillett et al.


+1.3-1.8 °C

Bayesian estimation of climate sensitivity based on a simple climate model fitted to observations of hemispheric temperatures and global ocean heat content (PDF)
(Environmetrics, Volume 23, Issue 3, pp. 253–271, May 2012)
- Magne Aldrin et. al.


+1.9 °C

Observational estimate of climate sensitivity from changes in the rate of ocean heat uptake and comparison to CMIP5 models
(Climate Dynamics, April 2013)
- Troy Masters


+1.98 °C

A fractal climate response function can simulate global average temperature trends of the modern era and the past millennium
(Climate Dynamics, Volume 40, Issue 11-12,pp. 2651-2670, June 2013)
- J. H. van Hateren


+1.7-2.3 °C

An objective Bayesian, improved approach for applying optimal fingerprint techniques to estimate climate sensitivity
(Journal of Climate, Volume 26, Issue 19, pp. 7414-7429, October 2013)
- Nicholas Lewis


+1.6 °C

The Potency of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) as a Greenhouse Gas
(Development in Earth Science, Volume 2, pp. 20-30, 2014)
- Antero Ollila


+0.6 °C

The role of ENSO in global ocean temperature changes during 1955–2011 simulated with a 1D climate model
(Asia-Pacific Journal of Atmospheric Sciences, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp. 229-237, February 2014)
- Roy W. Spencer, William D. Braswell


+1.3 °C

A minimal model for estimating climate sensitivity
(Ecological Modelling, Volume 276, pp. 80-84, March 2014)
- Craig Loehle


+1.99 °C


-------

For some reason, the IPCC and 'YOU'RE KILLING THE WORLD!" types everywhere have chosen to ignore all the above evidence, claim it is fraud by some 'big oil' or 'republican' conspiracy, and so forth.

In the meantime, the Pause is heading for 18 1/2 years in duration, and the alarmists have so far come up with 60 different reasons as to why it is happening, including some featuring the SUN, which, as any good alarmist knows, has *NO* effect on climate, and some of which contradict each other.

But, TRUST THEM, they are 'climate scientists,' and as some on this site will tell you, that makes them dispassionate, incorruptible gods of Truth!
Image size
498x801px 72.96 KB
© 2015 - 2024 Kajm
Comments3
Join the community to add your comment. Already a deviant? Log In
Kajm's avatar
Every time I see :iconamericandreaming: post something, I feel the need to respond.... and I've got Hundreds of pieces to respond with!

*edit* And what do you know! The above is a Perfect response to This piece Building Beliefs by AmericanDreaming

Come on in and soak up the Peer-reviewed Evidence for LOW Climate Sensitivity, AD!