The reason we cannot trust climate modeling.

3 min read

Deviation Actions

Kajm's avatar
By
Published:
1.1K Views
For those of you with either a scientific bent or who just want to know a bit more, especially if you are arguing point with alarmists (who are often ill-educated on the subject), this paper should help (opening paragraphs below). Written by climate scientist Judith Curry:

There is considerable debate over the fidelity and utility of global climate models

(GCMs). This debate occurs within the community of climate scientists, who disagree

about the amount of weight to give to climate models relative to observational analyses.

GCM outputs are also used by economists, regulatory agencies and policy makers,

so GCMs have received considerable scrutiny from a broader community of scientists,

engineers, software experts, and philosophers of science. This report attempts

to describe the debate surrounding GCMs to an educated but nontechnical audience.

Key summary points

GCMs have not been subject to the rigorous verification and validation that is

the norm for engineering and regulatory science.

There are valid concerns about a fundamental lack of predictability in the complex

nonlinear climate system.

There are numerous arguments supporting the conclusion that climate models

are not fit for the purpose of identifying with high confidence the proportion

of the 20th century warming that was human-caused as opposed to natural.

There is growing evidence that climate models predict too much warming from

increased atmospheric carbon dioxide.

The climate model simulation results for the 21st century reported by the Intergovernmental

Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) do not include key elements

of climate variability, and hence are not useful as projections for how the 21st

century climate will actually evolve.

Climate models are useful tools for conducting scientific research to understand the

climate system. However, the above points support the conclusion that current GCMs

are not fit for the purpose of attributing the causes of 20th century warming or for

predicting global or regional climate change on timescales of decades to centuries,

with any high level of confidence. By extension, GCMs are not fit for the purpose of

justifying political policies to fundamentally alter world social, economic and energy

systems. It is this application of climate model results that fuels the vociferousness of

the debate surrounding climate models.

-------

The paper goes into extensive details about the problems with climate models, such as their inability to properly model the role of clouds in the atmosphere.

The full paper can be found here www.thegwpf.org/content/upload…

Backup article by a scientist with an extensive background in computer modeling co2islife.wordpress.com/2017/0…